husker said:
amigo, if we are to use your system. since chs was down about 40 units when his plays started being tracked, the units that he started winning would be less because you would have decreased the size of the plays because you were down, RIGHT.
WRONG.
First off I stated from JAN. 1st.
A. HIS CLIENTS, who DID NOT lose any month in 2005, were up to a level where the units LOST in the first 2 weeks would have been less. Due to #1, scaling back to a prior unit size as your profits continue to increase. This would take too long to explain, as you are not here for the TRUTH but only to bash people, I will not explain it to you. Also, as jimmy mac can attest, on the tape, he tells us, his clients to use 3 different betting levels in conjunction with the other aluded to $ management methods. After the mid point of the first week monitored we were instructed to drop down to level one due to the losses and the personal situation that he was in (death of 2 close friends at Christmas).
As we win more, yes we step up our unit size. At the same time, as we progress, we take profit out and at intervals drop back to a previous unit size predetermined mathematically by the individuals own bankroll size etc...
B. After the second winning week in a row, actually prior to the end of the second winning week, we were told to go to level 3, the highest bet level.
Therefore, in conclusion, the losses were minimalized thru stepping down our bet level to level one & the aforementioned scaleback already due to profit levels. And, the winnings were maximized by stepping right back up to level 3.
Your assumptions would also not be true for anyone who had just began as a client in week one of tracking, and paid NO ATTENTION to Daves $ management instructions, as he/she would have been flat betting with no adjustment up or down.
None of this truly matters, as the mods all know, your only objective is to bash & attempt to taint others image here.
His long term clients, if requested, are sent a printout explaining.